How do nonviolent video games primarily differ from violent video games in terms of situational variables?

Nonviolent video games primarily differ from violent video games in that they are not likely to prime aggressive thought structures. This distinction is significant because violent video games often depict scenarios that can activate aggressive thoughts and behaviors in players, potentially leading to increased aggression in real-life situations. In contrast, nonviolent video games typically focus on cooperative play, problem-solving, or narratives that encourage empathy and pro-social behavior, which do not trigger the same aggressive cognitive processes.

This lack of activation of aggressive thought structures means that players of nonviolent games are less likely to experience increased aggression or hostile thoughts after gameplay, fostering a more positive mental state. This aligns with research suggesting that exposure to violent media can lead to desensitization to violence and may normalize aggressive responses, while nonviolent media can promote different, often more constructive, thought patterns.

In contrast, other factors mentioned in the choices, such as narrative complexity, cognitive engagement, and realism, do not specifically address the core difference in how these types of games affect a player's psychology and behavior related to aggression.